- The judgement lived in someone's head — only the person doing it knew the standard
- At volume you could only spot-check, and what slipped through usually surfaced at reconciliation
- Every repeat meant reading it all again from the top — nothing accumulated
Competitor Monitoring
Search competitors by keyword, capture live store data and screenshots, and produce a structured comparison report; one POST from your system triggers a run.
Why This Workflow Exists
To know what competitors changed, someone had to dig through the store regularly: check rankings, read product pages, archive screenshots. Doing it once is easy; doing it every week in a consistent format is not — the moment things get busy, it stops.
- The standard is written into 5 steps — everyone reads the same one
- Everything is checked item by item, no sampling; every run leaves a record you can go back to
- It runs unattended and, on error, stops where it is and preserves the full scene rather than carrying the fault downstream
How This Workflow Runs
The same team also runs these
Apple Search Ads Campaign Automation
An AI agent reviews up to 5,000 targeted keywords one by one and proposes bid changes and pauses; humans only approve the bid changes — on rejection or timeout, nothing is touched.
daily-growth-reportDaily growth report
Every morning, spend from both ad platforms and subscription revenue arrive in Slack as a spreadsheet, with AI commentary attached.
app-store-operationsApp Store Operations Automation
Review replies, version submissions, TestFlight distribution, and certificate monitoring all run as workflows; AI-drafted replies score their own quality first, then wait for human confirmation before publishing.